A44 Report

A44 Report

An A44 Report is a document prepared by an immigration officer when the immigration officer believes that a person in Canada may be inadmissible based on various grounds. This could include:

  • Criminality or serious criminality
  • Misrepresentation in immigration applications
  • Failure to comply with residency obligations
  • Security concerns
  • Medical or financial inadmissibility

Once an officer prepares a Section 44(1) Report, it is sent to the Minister for review. If the Minister finds it well-founded, the Minister may either refer the case to the Immigration Division for an admissibility hearing or issue a removal order directly in cases where an appeal is not allowed (as per Section 44(2) of the IRPA).

Receiving an A44 Report under Section 44 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is a serious matter that can impact your ability to stay in Canada. Whether you are a permanent resident or a foreign national, this report is the first step in the government’s process to determine whether you are inadmissible to Canada. If not properly handled, it can lead to an admissibility hearing, a removal order, or even a permanent ban from re-entering the country. At Kahlon Law Office, we provide expert legal guidance to help you navigate this process, protect your rights, and explore all possible legal options.

What are the key legal differences between Section 44(1) and Section 44(2)?

Understanding the distinction between these two subsections is crucial:

  • Section 44(1): The immigration officer prepares a report outlining the reasons why a person may be inadmissible.
  • Section 44(2): The Minister (or their delegate) reviews the report and decides whether to refer the case for a hearing or issue a removal order directly.

The decision at this stage is critical because it determines whether the individual will have the right to a hearing or face an immediate removal order.

What are the legal consequences of an A44 report?

An A44 Report can have serious implications, including:

  • A formal hearing before the Immigration Division to determine your status.
  • A removal or deportation order, preventing future re-entry into Canada.
  • Loss of permanent resident status for PR holders.
  • Limited or no right to appeal, depending on the type of inadmissibility finding.

However, immigration officers have discretion in issuing A44 reports, and in certain cases, factors such as Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) considerations can play a role in the outcome.

What key case law impact A44 reports?

  • Lin v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FCA 81

The Federal Court of Appeal ruled that judicial review of an A44(2) referral decision should only be granted in exceptional circumstances. The court emphasized that the decision to refer a case to the Immigration Division is a screening process, not a final finding of inadmissibility. Applicants must first exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.

  • Singh v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1170

The Federal Court ruled that CBSA officers have discretion to consider Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) factors when issuing A44 reports. While officers are not obligated to consider these factors, if they do, their assessment must be reasonable, transparent, and justifiable. This case highlights the importance of presenting strong H&C arguments in certain cases.

  • Zhang v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 746

The Federal Court confirmed that CBSA officers have jurisdiction to consider Humanitarian & Compassionate factors when issuing A44 reports for organized crime referrals. The court ruled that judicial review of these decisions is possible, especially when the applicant lacks an appeal right before the Immigration Appeal Division.

These cases highlight the limited judicial review availability, the discretion officers hold, and the importance of raising H&C factors where applicable.

How can Kahlon Law Office help?

At Kahlon Law Office, we understand the complexities of A44 reports and inadmissibility cases. Our legal team provides:

  • Comprehensive Case Evaluation – Understanding the specifics of your situation.
  • Strategic Response Planning – Preparing legal arguments and evidence to counter inadmissibility claims.
  • Representation Before Immigration Authorities – Defending your case at admissibility hearings.
  • Judicial Review and Appeals – Challenging unfair removal orders or decisions.
  • Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C) Applications – Presenting compelling arguments for discretionary relief.

We believe that every case is unique, and we work closely with our clients to ensure the best possible legal strategy is pursued. If you or a loved one has received an A44 Report, do not delay. Seeking legal advice at the earliest stage can significantly improve your chances of a favourable outcome.