Under Section 40(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), misrepresentation occurs when a person directly or indirectly provides false, misleading, or incomplete information to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) or the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).
Common examples of misrepresentation include:
Even unintentional errors or mistakes made by an immigration consultant can lead to a misrepresentation finding. Innocent misrepresentation is not a valid defence - even if the applicant was unaware of the error, they are still held responsible.
At Kahlon Law Office, we recognize that allegations of misrepresentation can have life-altering consequences. Whether you are applying for immigration, already a permanent resident or citizen, or facing a five-year ban, misrepresentation findings can lead to visa refusals, inadmissibility, removal orders, and even loss of status.
Our firm has a proven record of success in misrepresentation cases, including securing two significant victories at the Federal Court of Canada:
Additionally, we have successfully negotiated Federal Court settlements for numerous clients facing misrepresentation bans. With our expert legal strategy and advocacy, we can help you fight allegations of misrepresentation and protect your future in Canada.
1. Individuals facing allegations during the immigration process:
2. Temporary residents facing misrepresentation allegations:
If you obtained a work permit, study permit, or visitor visa through misrepresentation, you may face serious consequences, including a finding of inadmissibility. Immigration authorities can cancel your visa or permit, deny future applications, and issue a removal order, forcing you to leave Canada.
If IRCC or CBSA discovers that misrepresentation was involved in obtaining your temporary status, you may be required to attend an admissibility hearing at the Immigration Division (ID) of the IRB. A negative decision could lead to immediate loss of status and removal from Canada.
Case law: In Tofangchi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 427, the Federal Court ruled that even if a misrepresentation was made by an immigration consultant or third party, the applicant is still held responsible and can be deemed inadmissible.
If you are a worker, student, or visitor facing allegations of misrepresentation, contact Kahlon Law Office immediately to discuss your legal options. We have successfully represented clients in admissibility hearings, Federal Court challenges, and TRP applications to help them remain in Canada.
3. Permanent residents & citizens facing misrepresentation allegations:
4. Individuals who have already been banned for misrepresentation:
5. People applying for permanent residency despite inadmissibility:
We have successfully assisted clients in securing exemptions and obtaining PR despite misrepresentation findings.
With extensive experience in Federal Court litigation, admissibility hearings, and appeals, Kahlon Law Office provides comprehensive legal representation for individuals facing misrepresentation issues.
If you are facing a misrepresentation allegation, act now before it’s too late. Contact Kahlon Law Office today for a confidential consultation.
POWERED AND MAINTAINED BY INTOPDIGITAL
© Kahlon Law Office 2025.